Read more about the article 65 • Shooting from the Hip
Shooting from the Hip

65 • Shooting from the Hip

The phrase shooting from the hip is a metaphor for speaking or acting impulsively, without careful consideration or preparation. Someone who "shoots from the hip" trusts instinct and reacts immediately rather than stopping to analyze the situation. In UX design, it means making fast, intuitive product or layout decisions based on personal taste, gut feeling, or past experience rather than waiting for formal user research or metrics. It trades empirical validation for speed. Sometimes the shot lands, but unfortunately, that tends to make everyone forget about the shots that didn’t.

Continue Reading65 • Shooting from the Hip
Read more about the article 64 • Walking on Eggshells
Walking on Eggshells

64 • Walking on Eggshells

Walking on Eggshells means being extremely cautious in one’s actions or words, usually to avoid upsetting someone else. Avoiding conflict becomes more important than improving the product. In product design, walking on eggshells means that problems are discussed privately instead of openly, feedback gets softened, and research findings are carefully worded so nobody feels implicated. And that feature requested by the executive? Everyone knows it is questionable but nobody wants to be the person who says so. The team is still communicating - it just isn't saying what it really thinks.

Continue Reading64 • Walking on Eggshells
Read more about the article 63 • IKEA Effect
IKEA Effect

63 • IKEA Effect

The IKEA Effect is a psychological phenomenon where users love a product more because they helped build it. When users invest time and effort to set things up, they feel proud of the outcome which can significantly influence a product's perceived value and subsequent customer behavior with it. In UX design, this effect can be used to boost brand loyalty and engagement. Users love the solution - not because it's better - but because it feels personal and earned.

Continue Reading63 • IKEA Effect
Read more about the article 62 • Analysis Paralysis
Analysis Paralysis

62 • Analysis Paralysis

Analysis Paralysis is what happens when the pursuit of the best decision prevents any decision at all. Faced with too many options, too much information, or too many possible outcomes, thinking begins to replace action. What starts as careful consideration slowly turns into hesitation, as each new piece of data introduces additional complexity rather than clarity. The intent is to make a better choice - but the result is often no choice at all. In UX and product design, the dynamic is the same. More options, more data, and more possibilities promise better decisions - but without focus, they often lead to hesitation instead.

Continue Reading62 • Analysis Paralysis
Read more about the article 61 • Cutting Corners
Cutting Corners

61 • Cutting Corners

Cutting Corners means skipping important work to save money today, only to spend considerably more time fixing the consequences tomorrow. In UX, research or testing phases are abbreviated, omitted or postponed. Under pressure, these shortcuts feel rational because the product ships faster. But this practice usually backfires because the problems simply arrive later. You end up building a product that users don't want, leading to higher cost, extra fixes, and lost revenue.

Continue Reading61 • Cutting Corners